戴榕菁

那位我多次提到的Dialect在挣扎了一阵子之后，终于觉悟地喊出了“爱因斯坦对时间的看法是错误的。我们的现代理论陷入了困境。（Einstein was WRONG About Time. Our Modern Theories are in Trouble.）”【[1]】我感觉Dialect这次的大胆反抗应该与我过去一年多里给他的视频的评论有关。

读者会问：给他的视频留言的有成百上千，他又没有向我致谢，凭什么我会感觉他的觉悟与我的评论有关呢？

我的答案是：因为我没有看到任何其他人指出过他的错误，我只看到我一个人一直在（正确地）指出他的错误。

比如，三周前（8月24日）在题为“To Master Physics, First Master The Rotating Coordinate System”的视频【[2]】中Dialect还在宣传广义相对论，而我给他留言道：“To Master Physics, First Understand Physics. That is the way to avoid mathematical pollution.”。

在他6月8日的题为“How Superposition Causes Length Contraction -- And Explains the Principle of Relativity”的视频【[3]】下面我留言道：“1) You are just repeating what the late Jefimenko did more than a decade ago. 2) If you want to say SR is wrong, then just say it..... do not timidly imply it without speaking it out loud. 3) If you do think SR is wrong, then my suggestion: do not even try to step into the swamp of so-called relativistic mass.... that relativistic mass is not real. Accordingly, do not try to maintain the principle of relativity as the first postulate of SR....that principle is very wrong.... 4) If you still feel SR is somewhat correct, then you are wasting time. All in all, if you feel that you need to wake up, just get off the bed, do not stay half wake.”在给该视频留言后，我紧接着写了一篇题为 “难道他是。。。。？”中文博客文章【[4]】，更加详细地分析了给视频中的几个严重的错误。

在他2月3日的题为“Matrix Theory: Relativity Without Relative Space or Time”【[5]】的视频下面，我留言道：“Sad to see your struggle of futile trials, with sympathy though......the only substantial progress you have made in this video is to admit the existence of the so-called "background"......but then you tried hard to confuse it with the Lorentzian ether assumption......Making Einstein's postulate unreal while making what Lorentz called by himself as assumptions to be real cannot save your trouble......Well, while you resist to wake up, the world is still moving on......The sail has passed the STR more than one year ago while we are still watching you struggle in the swirl.......”

在他的2023年11月18日题为“Einstein's Relativity contains a HUGE Loophole. Its Implications Can't Be Ignored.”【[6]】的视频下面我留言道：“good job...but too late and too weak....the one-way constancy of speed of light is NOT just "unverifiable" but has been systematically disproved in "The Fall of Special Relativity and The Absoluteness of Space and Time" more than one year ago, and was summarized in "When philosophy is disparaged" one year ago......as a result, the one-way constancy of speed of light is replaced by the revised postulate of speed of light in vacuum.”。

在他的2023年8月5日的题为“What Time Dilation ACTUALLY Is In Relativity (Hint: It has nothing to do with time)”【[7]】的视频下面我留言道：“What you missed in the closing remarks is this: The Postulate of the Constancy of Speed of Light in Vacuum is Wrong because that postulate suppose the speed of light in vacuum is the same to all observers......The speed of light in constant in vacuum itself, but not to all observers and you need to make this clear!

Now if we forget your closing statement at the end of the video, I can give you this credit that you are smashing special relativity by rebuking the so-called time dilation in this video......if you do not agree with my take of your video, could you come out to clarify it? ”

他回复道：“Thanks for watching! The postulate of the invariance of speed of light, according to the Einsteinian interpretation, means the speed of light is constant for all observers, when those observers are measuring it in a vacuum. So if you have two observers in a vacuum traveling at different velocities, they will measure the same speed for any beam of light.

Of course, as Veritasium points out in an excellent video, measuring the speed of light is an impossibility, which makes Einstein's postulate an measurement assumption, not an empirical reality.”

我又回复道：“You just touched the critical defect of the philosophy behind special relativity.....as I mentioned in an earlier comment to this video that it is a confusion between the issue of CALIBRATION with the essence.

How you measure the speed is something that can be calibrated which is not the essence of speed......

What we need now is the revised postulate of speed of light in vacuum that you can find online, which states that [The speed of light is constant in vacuum which is not attached to any specific material object, and its value is given by the Maxwell formula c = 1/√(ε˳µ˳), where εo is permittivity in vacuum and μo is permeability in vacuum.]”

我又接着说：“Why don't you just spell it out: no time dilation and length contraction due to kinematic motions in nature at all?

Your language used to end the video is too vague......you have been doing this vague business all along in all your relativity related videos so that it is hard for critics like me to hammer or affirm your statements with one clear shot , but in the meantime those who are not of critical might still think that you are upholding special relativity.

What you missed in the closing remarks is this: The Constancy of Speed of Light in Vacuum is Wrong!

Now if we forget your closing statement at the end of the video, I can give you this credit that you are smashing special relativity by rebuking the so-called time dilation in this video......if you do not agree with my take of your video, could you come out to clarify it?”

与之相应地，我又写了三篇与之相关的中文博客文章【[8],[9],[10]】。

讨论

从三周前还在宣传广义相对论到两天前（我今天才看到）终于大声呐喊出“爱因斯坦对时间的看法是错误的。我们的现代理论陷入了困境。（Einstein was WRONG About Time. Our Modern Theories are in Trouble.）”，Dialect终于迈出了他的人生的一大步。尽管对于整个人类文明来说他这已经只是一小步了（因为自两年前我就已经推翻了狭义相对论，并系统地否定了相对论的时空观【[11],[12]】），但仍是非常可喜的一步，因为这代表着在我单枪匹马对抗主流学界两年半之后，Dialect背后的那股强大的维护相对论的势力终于开始内讧了！

其实，早在我于2022年初开始检讨并推翻狭义相对论之前好几年，Dialect就开始对狭义相对论进行反思了，不过他的出发点是想要维护并完善狭义相对论，也就是要对狭义相对论进行修修补补。尽管如来自大洋对岸的某网军小头目（也算是我当初在科大参加研究生杂志的战友）过去两年里反复对我发出的威胁中说的那样，对相对论的质疑属于在上世纪就有了的政治上的错误，感谢上帝的带领，过去两年半里我对狭义相对论系统性的推翻以及对于与狭义相对论相关的包括广义相对论和量子力学在内的20世纪物理学之系统性的反思和批判是前所未有的。

我之所以这里要强调我过去两年半里所做的推翻狭义相对论以及对与之相关的20世纪物理学的批判是前所未有的主要有两方面的原因：

其一，要将一切荣耀归于上帝。过去两年半里除了意大利的那位Didier Viel先生曾给我提供过些许帮助之外，我基本上是单枪匹马一人独战连带着网军和科普在内的整个主流学界，而这过程中的每一步（包括在需要的时候就出现了Didier的相关帮助在内）都有来自上帝对我的直接带领。

其二，尽管在上帝的带领下我是第一个系统推翻狭义相对论并系统批判与之相关的20世纪物理学问题的，而且我推翻狭义相对论的工作首先是发表在中文网站，我系统反思批判20世纪物理学的文章也都基本上是首先在中文博客发表然后才将其中一些整理成英文文章，但遗憾的是，华人社会在这次人类物理学的重大转折关头，再一次地落在Dialect他们代表的西方人的后面！几天前，中国物理杂志B（Chinese Physics B）刚刚又拒绝了我关于薛定谔对其著名方程的推导错误的文章【[13]】。