为什么我们无法推导薛定谔方程? |
送交者: 2021年07月28日12:38:45 于 [世界时事论坛] 发送悄悄话 |
|
慕容青草 今天有典型的中式网络思维者给我短信号称他知道如何推导薛定谔方程。原本对这种中式网络专业人士的标致性的轻佻思维应该置之一笑而已,但正好在网上碰上一则讲解为什么我们无法推导薛定谔方程的帖子,就将之转贴于此 (https://www.quora.com/Why-we-say-that-we-cant-derive-Schrodinger-equation): Why we say that we can't "derive" Schrodinger equation? Schrodinger's equation cannot be derived. It was thought up using logical arguments and so far it has seemed to work experimentally. The equations is essentially a re-write up for energy conservation: E=T+V Where T is the Kinetic Energy and V is the potential. However, to be more explicit we must work with operators (if you are unsure what operators are I suggest you look them up; this will give you a better understanding of what's going on). The KE for a particle is given by the KE Operator: T^=−ℏ22m∂2∂x2 This comes from the momentum operator of the particle/wave p^=−ih∂/∂x . You use this in the analogous classical mechanics equation for KE to obtain T^ (Try doing this as an exercise). So now we are left with just putting it all together. The first equation turns into: −ℏ22m∂2Ψ∂x2+V(x)Ψ=EΨ And we define the Hamiltonian H^ as: H^=−ℏ22m∂2∂x2+V(x) Thus: H^Ψ=EΨ
|
|
|
|
实用资讯 | |
|
|
一周点击热帖 | 更多>> |
|
|
一周回复热帖 |
|
历史上的今天:回复热帖 |
2020: | 尤瓦尔·赫拉利的“人类简史”(1) | |
2020: | 台海是否有可能开战? | |
2019: | 毛主席说 | |
2019: | 毛主席是对的! | |
2018: | 看看满清皇帝那笔漂亮的毛笔字 | |
2018: | 好文转载-中国的“科”学和欧美的科学 | |
2017: | 从刘晓波和司马懿谈知识分子与士人 | |
2017: | 孙政才被整肃 为何16省份没有开会表态 | |
2016: | 敬酒不吃吃罚酒---中美关系小议 zt | |
2016: | 中国一点都不能少,为何漏了南海纳土纳 | |
|