繁体中文  
 
版主:黑木崖
 · 九阳全新免清洗型豆浆机 全美最低
 
中国政府否认有所谓”藏水入疆“计划
送交者:  2017年11月01日08:27:42 于 [世界军事论坛] 发送悄悄话


Top Chinese tunnel engineer 'has not heard of the Brahmaputra water tunnel' 

ANANTH KRISHNAN | BEIJING | WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 1, 2017 

Not heard of any plans to build a 1,000 km water diversion tunnel in Tibet for the Brahmaputra river, a top Chinese engineer says. 

The Three Gorges Dam | Photo: Reuters The Three Gorges Dam | Photo: Reuters A top Chinese engineer who is building China's longest water tunnel in Yunnan province has said he "has not heard of" any plans to build a 1,000 km water diversion tunnel in Tibet for the Brahmaputra river. 

His comments come a day after the Chinese government denied a media report which said engineers had submitted a plan in March to build the world's longest tunnel to divert the Brahmaputra's waters from Tibet to arid Xinjiang. The Chinese Foreign Ministry said it was "a false report". The report, in the South China Morning Post, had quoted several Chinese experts who said that an on-going 600 km water tunnel in Yunnan was being used as "a demonstration project" for the Tibet Brahmaputra tunnel. 

But the chief engineer of the Yunnan plan denied this on Wednesday. "There is no such direction from the central government, and I've never heard of any plan laid out for a Tibet-Xinjiang tunnel project," Zhao Shijie, chief engineer of the Dianzhong water diversion project in Yunnan, told the Global Times. He told the paper that "rumours" about the tunnel were not new, but were "baseless". The Yunnan tunnel project, which has no connection to the reported Tibet plan, began in August and the 660 km tunnel will divert water from the Jinsha river to cities in Yunnan, including capital Kunming. 

The plan is estimated to cost 78 billion Yuan. The Global Times said citing a 2006 media report that "a plan to divert water from Tibet to the northern parts of China was heatedly discussed in the 1990s. Over the decade, 208 lawmakers and 118 political advisers raised proposals and motions on the plan." "However, the dream of massive water diversions has never been approved due to concerns of the huge cost and potential for damaging the landscape," it added. Mei Xinyu, a scholar at the Chinese Academy of International Trade and Economic Cooperation, told the paper such a diversion would have unwanted ramifications. "I firmly oppose the project, as Xinjiang cannot afford this project. 

The estimated cost of diverting water from Tibet to Xinjiang would be five times that of Xinjiang's annual GDP. It may depend massively on central government subsidies and the assistance of local governments in other regions, which likely would lead to social instability." The SCMP report quoted a researcher as saying "In five to ten years from now, the technology will be ready and the cost affordable, and the temptation of the benefits will be difficult to resist". 

Another researcher, however, told the paper the Tibet tunnel would cost more than 1 trillion Yuan-five times the cost of the Three Gorges dam-which would be prohibitive. A diversion of the Brahmaputra's waters would have ramifications for India and Bangladesh. China's dams in Xinjiang and in Yunnan have caused concern in neighbouring countries, from Kazakhstan to Laos and Thailand. While its dams on the Brahmaputra are at an early stage, India and China have established a working group mechanism on cross-border resources, but this has had a limited mandate so far. In 2013, both sides agreed to allow Indian hydrological experts to travel to Tibet to monitor flows of the Brahmaputra. 

China also agreed that year to provide hydrological data during the flood season from May until October every year. That cooperation worked from 2014 to 2016, but data wasn't submitted this year. Chinese officials said it was because of upgrading monitoring stations. China has so far built one 510 MW dam at Zangmu on the river's upper reaches, and has begun work on three more dams on the river. Beijing says these are run of the river dams for hydropower generation and won't store large volumes of water, but some experts have said it could alter the river's ecosystem. The Brahmaputra isn't entirely dependent on flows from China, with a large catchment area in Arunachal Pradesh in India. India has commissioned a study to ascertain the percentage of flows dependent on China, with varying estimates from experts.

0%(0)
0%(0)
  就是通了也会否认的.  /无内容 - rwolf 11/01/17 (594)
    这种抵赖就不是中国人干的事  /无内容 - 古宇庙 11/01/17 (591)
        如果有也叫“防洪救灾工程”不是“藏水入疆计划”  /无内容 - eachus 11/02/17 (575)
          你觉得这项目万事俱备且易如反掌,只欠文科生来找个借口是吗?  /无内容 - 驭风 11/02/17 (573)
            八路干事只做不说,时间到了就突然出现是常见的现象  /无内容 - eachus 11/02/17 (544)
标 题 (必选项):
内 容 (选填项):
实用资讯
北美最大最全的折扣机票网站
美国名厂保健品一级代理,花旗参,维他命,鱼油,卵磷脂,30天退货保证.买百免邮.
一周点击热帖 更多>>
一周回复热帖
历史上的今天:回复热帖
2016: 喜欢J20的来看这段高清视频吧,完爆央视
2016: 两岸新青年:朱素恕》美式民主是新帝国
2015: 邓聿文:中美新冷战拉开帷幕 美方行动是
2015: 我们的三沙邮轮又长大了....(.001A-20
2014: 俄媒说093软肋:中国设计人员至今仍不愿
2014: 全球首架商用载人飞船试飞坠毁(图)
2013: 小日本不是瞎叫的 zt
2013: 俄罗斯之声: 解放军隧道隐藏着什么? z
2012: 专家称我航空工业落后15年 追赶美国指日
2012: 印媒强调歼31发动机并非中国自研 包括歼