Honest mistake could be either side. Why do you presume it is Han's mistake?

I believe either side want to do it right. But I do not like the way media treat both sides. It is a bias report without merit and serious in-depth investigation. Han asked a correct question: "If David's report can not be taken as supporting evidence, then why those opposite reports can?" That's why I do not trust media. Mass media is basically commercialized gossip, or political propanganda machine (for all the sides). There are very few independent, non-biased, and deep thinking journalists, alomost like endangered species.