are you sure? |
送交者: rca 2011月11月11日16:31:11 于 [世界军事论坛] 发送悄悄话 |
回 答: 装备处于绝对劣势---完全不对,陆空基本相等。 由 hmy 于 2011-11-11 14:54:58 |
my understanding has been that CVA had never achieved parity in firepower with that of the US arm forces in Korean war. Even toward the end of the conflict when the preponderance of the US firepower is no longer overwhelming as it was during the onset, CVA was still not quite on par with that of US. I remember reading a book stating that artillary equipment of a Chinese Corp can only compared to that a US division. Airpower parity? I am not convinced.
|
|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
实用资讯 | |
|
|
一周点击热帖 | 更多>> |
一周回复热帖 |
历史上的今天:回复热帖 |
2010: | 中国大陆被日本统治最久的地区开始发动 | |
2010: | 新疆渤海引水工程已开工 投资方称每年可 | |
2009: | 刘少奇水平不高,那只是比老毛差点,但 | |
2009: | 为美国人鸣不平,美国人把那么多的工业 | |