繁体中文  
 
版主:bob
 · 九阳全新免清洗型豆浆机 全美最低
 
法国再遭ISIS恐袭,美国政治家怎么说? zt
送交者:  2016年07月28日09:07:04 于 [世界时事论坛] 发送悄悄话


image.jpeg

《am Newyork》社论,题目是:不要混淆穆斯林和“伊斯兰圣战”组织。

Don't confuse all Muslisms with Jihadists。(伊斯兰圣战主义者)

Yesterday's attack in a Roman Catholic Church in northern France is both devastatingly symbolic and tragically significant。

Two Islamic State terrorists took multiple hostages during a morning Mass,used nuns as human shields and killed an 85-year-old priest by slitting his throat with a knife。A nun who witnessed the attack said the men filmed the execution and then walked around the altar of the 17th century stone church,sermonizing in Arabic。They were shot dead by police as they tried to get away。

France is besieged by the number of young Muslim men who have become radicalized。This time,terror came to a place of sanctuary,prayer and worship。The killing of the Rev.Jacques Hamel was a deliberately provocative assault by two men whom ISIS later described as its “soliders。”

While the United States doesn't have Europe's challenges in dealing with radicalization,the priest's killing undoubtedly will erter our political debates。These are complex challenges as we try to define the enemy。Solutions don't lie in simple slogans or semantic debates。

Republicans,led by Donald Trump,call it “radical Islam,”while President Barack Obama has sidestepped the phrase,saying he doesn't want to link terrorism with the broader,Muslim community。Only recently has Hillary Clinton labeled such attacks “radical Islamism,” a distinction focaused on Jihadist ideology that encourages the spread of Islam by violence。

Europe and the Unined States must determine who is responsible for murderous attacks。If specific terminology helps us do that,so be it。But labels can be dangerous。It's far too easy for names,titles and words to be misused or misunderstood。This is a time to be sophisticated in our language and our responses。“Radical Islam” and “radical Islamism” are not interchangeable with “Muslim,” and there is a risk that some people won't make the necessary distinction。

We are a nation built on tolerance。Blanket indictments of our innocent fellow citizens are not who we are。Condemnation of the jihadist movement is necessary,but must be precise。Even as we focus on who our enemies are and what we fear,we must not forget who and what they are not。

0%(0)
0%(0)
标 题 (必选项):
内 容 (选填项):
实用资讯
北美最大最全的折扣机票网站
美国名厂保健品一级代理,花旗参,维他命,鱼油,卵磷脂,30天退货保证.买百免邮.
一周点击热帖 更多>>
一周回复热帖
历史上的今天:回复热帖
2015: 因民族政策,中央民族报七评原统战部长
2015: 一生必须来一次(多图) z
2014: 你们说文革还要不要搞?我看很有必要
2014: 再说罗将军对阵吴贱民大使
2013: 不算腐败?吴法宪谈任命林立果为空军作
2013: “共同富裕” 是中国特色社会主义的核心
2012: x-file 这个王八蛋,整个一当代义和团,
2012: 你们瞎吵个啥,杭州小伙拿400米自由泳金
2011: 之前,我以为掩埋车头是谣言 看央视如是
2011: 有哪些势力想做掉铁道部、肢解中国铁路