用户名:
密 码:
忘记密码?
繁体中文  
 
版主:黑木崖
 · 九阳全新免清洗型豆浆机 全美最低
 
Misunderstanding China by Michael Pillsbury
送交者:  2014年09月18日02:06:12 于 [世界军事论坛] 发送悄悄话

Misunderstanding China

How did Western policy makers and academics repeatedly get China so wrong?

Sept. 17, 2014 12:50 p.m. ET

On October 1, 1949, Mao Zedong proclaimed the founding of the People's Republic of China while standing atop Beijing's Gate of Heavenly Peace. In the decades that followed, many China watchers in the West confidently predicted the fall of his regime. Others hoped that a cadre of moderates in the Beijing government would lead to a kinder, gentler, more democratic China.

As China turns 65 in a couple weeks, its ruling Party appears nowhere close to planning its retirement party. It is stronger, more nationalistic and more committed to maintaining one-party rule than at any time since Mao's death.

Nor has President Xi Jinping been the moderate reformer some hoped for. Under the cover of anti-corruption, Mr. Xi has consolidated his power over the party and squelched talk of democracy. In a speech to the National Congress earlier this month, he said that preventing the government from becoming "leaderless [and] fragmented" with "political fighting and wrangling between political parties" was among his top priorities. Even in Hong Kong, the last bastion of political freedom in China, Mr. Xi has ruled out free elections for 2017.

What happened? How did Western policy makers and academics repeatedly get China so wrong? To this day there is no expert consensus on China's economic growth and GDP, the size of its military and intelligence budgets, or even its intentions toward the West. Much less is there consensus on what direction China will take, even though most evidence points to political retrenchment, surging nationalism and opposition to the postwar international system.

Western governments failed to understand Mao's China from the beginning. The experts in the Truman and Eisenhower administrations believed it would not enter the Korean War. Kennedy and Johnson believed that China would stay out of Vietnam. Every American administration up to that point also believed that China would be permanently aligned with the Soviet Union as something of a junior partner. Then a Sino-Soviet border war broke out in 1969, shocking the U.S. foreign policy establishment.

Chairman Mao Tse Tung announces the founding of the People's Republic of China on October 1, 1949. UIG via Getty Images

When Richard Nixon and Henry Kissinger took office, the American view was that relations between China and Russia were permanently broken, thus leading to the surprising "opening" in 1972. By the time Ronald Reagan took office, the prevailing view was that "so-called Communist China," as Reagan himself liked to put it, was on the path to free market democracy.

That arrival is now three decades overdue. No one in the George H. W. Bush administration foresaw the 1989 Tiananmen massacre. A year later, American policy makers were shocked again when China reversed its diplomatic course and began buying Russian fighters and submarines to threaten Taiwan.

The forecast that the CCP would wither away in the face of political reforms and yield to a multi-party, democratic system has proven alarmingly wrong. Instead, the party has reinvented itself by recruiting the middle class and millionaires to its cause. Most estimates suggest China's GDP is still half state-controlled (though we don't know that for sure, either).

Similarly, continuing forecasts of democracy—such as Bruce Gilley's "China's Democratic Future, How It Will Happen"—continue to prove embarrassing for professors and journalists who write them. As for books on China's economic future, there remains no consensus. One well-known book on the shelves of many China scholars—"The Coming Collapse of China"—competes with another called "When China Rules the World."

False predictions have also been made about the strength of the People's Liberation Army—that it would remain a short-legged, land-based force. Instead, in August 2014, President Xi met with generals to discuss innovative plans to catch up with America's military force. Which generals were there? The same ones we are reassured are mere "fringe" elements in the Chinese government—including General Liu Yazhou, the host of a venomous anti-U.S. video called "Silent Contest."

These generals are now attacking President Obama for a routine U.S. military exercise near Guam involving two aircraft carriers that is scheduled to run this week. They claim that the act is an American provocation designed to threaten China's birthday party.

In other words, the Middle Kingdom—potentially the most formidable opponent we have ever faced—remains as much of a mystery as ever.

What accounts for this? Why does doubt and conjecture still shroud a nation that for six decades we have studied, worked against, then allied with, then clashed with again?

The answer that I've come to after studying the Chinese for 40 years is that the problem is not China, but us. For six decades we Westerners have looked at China through our own self-interest—as a potential check against the Soviets, or a source of American trade and business investment.

We have projected on the Chinese a pleasing image—a democracy in waiting, or a docile Confucian civilization seeking global harmony. We have been reassured by China's leaders seeking our economic, scientific and military assistance, and have ignored writings, actions and declarations that warn of growing nationalism. After 65 years, we don't know what China wants because we haven't truly listened to some of the powerful voices that undermine our wishful thinking.

As China continues its rise, our first step should be to dismantle comfortable assumptions and false realities. We must study China anew and recognize that its Communist rulers are determined not to fade into history.

Mr. Pillsbury is a senior fellow at the Hudson Institute and a consultant to the U.S. Defense Department.

0%(0)
0%(0)
  很簡單,毛騙了蘇聯,鄧騙了山木。 - amlink 09/20/14 (394)
    击中要害。  /无内容 - 天蓝蓝 09/19/14 (408)
    我早说过,他们那种民主在西方那里是一种不理性的宗教。  /无内容 - yehe 09/19/14 (425)
    非常的有见地。 佩服!顶一个!  /无内容 - ddl 09/18/14 (457)
  西方人从来就那德性!英文写得好!  /无内容 - 风雨人 09/18/14 (414)
    请看一下刘今年在军网和新华社发的东西就知道刘是什么货色了 - 大国有大国的智慧 09/18/14 (754)
      看不出有什么问题,请提示。  /无内容 - 汉唐 09/18/14 (464)
        网上流传刘亚洲言论和他在正式刊物发表的言论一脉相承。例如: - 大国有大国的智慧 09/18/14 (604)
    我的感觉,鹰派们也开始迷惑了。  /无内容 - kt22tu 09/18/14 (463)
      我一直认为网络上此起彼伏的刘亚洲大作都是假的。  /无内容 - 汉唐 09/18/14 (448)
  这篇文章值得读读。  /无内容 - kt22tu 09/18/14 (414)
绗� 鍚� (蹇呴€夐」): 瀵� 鐮� (蹇呴€夐」): 娉ㄥ唽鏂扮敤鎴�
标 题 (必选项):
内 容 (选填项):

娈佃惤鏍煎紡
瀛椾綋
瀛楀彿
实用资讯
北美最大最全的折扣机票网站
美国名厂保健品一级代理,花旗参,维他命,鱼油,卵磷脂,30天退货保证.买百免邮.
一周点击热帖 更多>>
1 鏉╋拷20B濞撳懏娅氭鐐额攽閸ワ拷 eastwest
2 閸楁澘瀹抽崥鎾虫綎娴滃棴绱濋梿鍛潤濮樺鏁哥粩娆愬灉閸欘亣鍏樼拠锟� eastwest
3 閸掓艾鍨伴敍灞肩礇閺堟寮甸悳鈺冧紑閿涘苯妯婇悙纭咁洬濮樻挳姣﹂弨锟� eastwest
4 閵嗗﹦绮″ù搴☆劅娴滄亽鈧绱伴懟瑙勭亯閹舵ɑ鍨锋稊瀣勾閿涘奔鑵� eastwest
5 娑擃厼娴楁潏鐟邦暔瀵偓瀵よ桨绗橀悾灞炬付婢堆冧紣缁嬪绱濋崡鏉垮 eastwest
6 瀹告繃娅橀敍姘箒5閺嬫儼顫﹂崙鏄忔儰 閸楁澘瀹虫禍铏圭壃闂冩彃銇� eastwest
7 鏉╂瑦娼梾鎰杸閻ㄥ嫭绉烽幁顖氱安鐠囥儵鍣哥憴鍡礉瀹告繃娅樼憰锟� eastwest
8 娑擃厼娴楁稉顓烆劅閻㈢兌ISA濞村鐦崗銊ф倖闁儵浠存0鍡楀帥 eastwest
9 闂嗗懍绗呭銉р柤娴犮倓绗橀悾灞惧剷閸欑櫢绱濇担鍡楃暊閻ㄥ嫭鍓版稊锟� eastwest
10 閸忋劎鎮嗛崗鍗炴倖閻℃粣绱伴張鈧懘蹇擃殞濡楀牏瀵烽悜鍫㈠劤閸氭垹澹� eastwest
一周回复热帖
1 娑撳﹤鎮庨惃鍕紲閹叉儳寮电憰浣风瑐濠曟棑绱垫稉顓濈缚闂傛粓宓夐崥锟� zebraman
2 鏉╋拷20B濞撳懏娅氭鐐额攽閸ワ拷 eastwest
3 娑擃厼娴楁稉鈧弮锔筋劅缂佺喎褰村﹢鎾呯礉鐠у瞼绶ㄩ崶鎴掔瑝娴兼艾濮� eastwest
4 閼叉彃鍔圭悰銉ㄥ垱閺€璺ㄧ摜閺夈儰绨¢敍锟�3閸涖劌鐬炬禒銉ょ瑓婵犳潙杈� 3閼存氨灏�
5 婵傚洨鎲洪崥鎴濆祪鎼达箑鍙曢崣鍝ュ盀娑撳﹦鏁搁崝銊ㄦ簠閻顔嶉張锟� eastwest
6 濞夌増鐓径褎鍨拫浣稿帥瀵偓閻ㄥ嫮浼€閿涚喍鑵戦崶鍊燁嚉閺€顖涘瘮 eastwest
7 閼辨柨鎮庨崶钘変紣閸欐垹绮嶇紒鍥ㄥГ閸涘﹦袨閿涘奔鑵戦崶钘夊煑闁拷 eastwest
8 鎼村﹪鎽甸惃鍕彠缁嬪孩鍨惃鍕鐏炩偓瀹歌尙绮¢崗銊╂桨閸涘牏骞� 閸氬鑳屾径姘纯濡拷
9 閸楀厖濞囬崷锟�2025楠炶揪绱濆☉鍫ユ珟娑擃厼娴楁禍铏规畱瀹曞洦纾� eastwest
10 閸楁澘瀹抽崥鎾虫綎娴滃棴绱濋梿鍛潤濮樺鏁哥粩娆愬灉閸欘亣鍏樼拠锟� eastwest
历史上的今天:回复热帖
2013: 居然是真的,饭后吐真言啊,绝望中的希
2013: iOS 7 有主动拦截
2012: 中科大85后美女副教授 双料博士后引人羡
2012: 站坡了,站坡了,站坡了,清晰大图 zt
2011: "台湾张学良"会随时出现, 大
2011: 令哈日愤精绝望的中日综合国力对比!
2010: 解读朝鲜战争的中国价值:以战止战获和
2010: 韓寒被和諧的新文 遊行的意義 (ZT)
2009: 确定接班地位 习近平任军委副主席获得通
2009: 习太子这次没有正式扶正么?