用户名:
密 码:
忘记密码?
繁体中文  
 
版主:bob
 · 九阳全新免清洗型豆浆机 全美最低
 
哈里斯民调反超,Trump还有希望吗?
送交者:  2024年08月17日03:29:03 于 [世界时事论坛] 发送悄悄话

如果9月10日的辩论,川普翻不了盘,他八成就没有机会了。

拜登退选,哈里斯接手,不是Trump的胜利,却给了他一种虚假的胜利感,更增添了几分傲慢和轻狂,而且继续纠结于和拜登争高下,谈各种国际国内政策策略,以一种已经胜选的口吻谈乌克兰战争,选择副手和轻视全新的竞争对手——年轻世代的哈里斯!只能是漏洞百出,授人以柄!

Trump似乎完全没有意识到,在美国的年轻选民心中,他和拜登一样,被视作同一世代的过气政客,他们不管你回锅什么政策,甚至什么理由都不要,仅仅因为哈里斯是更年轻更有活力的美国人,就会选择她呢?!

当然,现在还为时尚早,局势也不是坏到完全没有扭转的可能。那就要看,哈里斯有没有软肋,而且她是不是象Trump一样,被并非最后的胜利冲昏头脑。哈里斯的软肋,不是她的过去,不是她的能力(质疑这个完全没有意义),而是她奉行“分好蛋糕”而非“做大蛋糕”、关注“结果平等”而非“过程平等”的“大锅饭”政策,过于用鲜花讨好选民,将可能把美国引向“通往奴役之路”——让美国“拉美化”!

Trump应当抓住的是哈里斯的软肋,用委内瑞拉马杜罗做反而教材,而以阿根廷米莱总统“唤醒雄狮”为己任,将竞选辩论的焦点转移到经济政策和美国的未来发展上,激发美国年轻世代和“铁锈带”选民的辨识能力和创造热情!

当然啦,我说“哈里斯的软肋”,那么,这话也是说给哈里斯听的,如果她的格局足够大!其实拜登这三年多,并没有完全抛弃川普上一任期践行的基本政策,而且某些方面做得更老到。

正如麦克阿瑟在日本投降仪式上的演讲所说:“倘若我们要拯救肉体,就必然从精神层面入手!”美国的伟大,植根于"We the People"精神权能及其生命自组织力与外连接平衡力得到全球首屈一指的充分发挥!这也是Trump第一个任期内,初露端倪的“川普经济学”(Trumpnomics)的精神实质!

当代美国人,也应当有一个莎士比亚式的“王子之问”:To be or not to be的问题。就象英国摇滚乐队The Beatles歌曲《Live and Let Die》那样,具有面对生存与毁灭时的彷徨、抉择,勇敢地选择Live and let live——即一种处理人际、群际、国际、乃至星际关系(包括人与自然、人与社会、人与自己身心灵三大关系)的思维方式和价值取向,那么,也就是把Live and Let Die与To be or not to be,放在Live and let live的语境,中来理解人们在彷徨与抉择、生存与毁灭的情感基调和选择结果!

并由此引出一个警示世人的糟糕后果——即:如果不能“Live and let live”(互利互惠,自己活也让别人活,生生不息),那么,就可能会导致“Evil and let evil”(自己邪恶,也让别人邪恶,互坑互害)!

将Live and let live上升到哲学认知,就是所有个体、共同体、Trust组织,尤其是群体身份的代表人物(尤其是作为世界第一强国的领导人),都要改变过去主客体二元对立的观念,即不以主体(Subject)自居,而把他者(她、它、祂)作为客体物质对象(Object)来支配操纵(哪怕动机再好也不行),也就是在认知上将主客体二元转变为主体间性即交互主体(Intersubjective)上,并且用共生(Symbiosos)亦即Live and let live 加能规范。

这样,2024年美国总统候选人,就继温思罗普“山巅之城”精神之后,站在了一个当代哲学新范式的高度——对于人类生活方式创新与再选择:凡事交互主体共生(Everything Intersubjective Symbiosism)!

当然,这对现行思维——即造成“全球性问题”的思维方式,是一种极富挑战性的智慧要求!


Archer Hong Qian

Vancouver, August 15, 2024


Harris Surpasses in Polls, Does Trump Still Have a Chance?


If Trump cannot turn the tide in the September 10 debate, he likely

 has little chance left.


Biden's withdrawal and Harris taking over is not a victory for 

Trump, but it has given him a false sense of victory, further 

adding to his arrogance and recklessness. He continues to focus 

on competing with Biden, discussing various international and 

domestic policies and strategies, speaking about the Ukraine war 

with a tone of already having won, choosing a running mate, and 

underestimating his new opponent—the younger generation's Harris!


This can only lead to many vulnerabilities and provide others with

 ample opportunities to attack him.


Trump seems completely unaware that in the eyes of young American 

voters, he and Biden are seen as outdated politicians of the same 

generation. They don’t care about his recycled policies or any 

other justifications; simply because Harris is younger and more 

vibrant, they will choose her.


Of course, it's still too early, and the situation hasn't 

deteriorated to the point of being irreversible. It depends on 

whether Harris has any weaknesses and whether she, like Trump, 

gets carried away by a victory that isn't final. Harris's weakness

is not her past or her abilities (questioning this is meaningless),

but rather her policy of "dividing the cake" rather than "making 

the cake bigger," her focus on "equality of outcome" rather than 

"equality of process," and her "one-pot meal" policy that overly 

panders to voters with flowers, potentially leading America down 

the "road to serfdom"—turning the U.S. into "Latin America"!


Trump should seize on Harris's weaknesses, using Venezuela’s Maduro 

as a cautionary example, and take on the mission of Argentina's 

President Milei to "awaken the lion." He should shift the focus 

of the campaign debate to economic policies and the future 

development of America, inspiring the discernment and creative 

enthusiasm of young American voters and those in the "Rust Belt."


As MacArthur said in his speech at the Japanese surrender 

ceremony: "If we are to save the flesh, we must begin with the 

spirit!" The greatness of America is rooted in the spirit and 

power of "We the People," as well as its unparalleled global 

leadership in the balance of self-organizational life force and 

external connections. This is also the spiritual essence of 

"Trumpnomics," which began to emerge during Trump's first term.


Modern Americans should also face a Shakespearean "Prince's 

question": To be or not to be. Just like the British rock band 

The Beatles' song "Live and Let Die," which reflects the hesitation 

and choices when faced with survival and destruction, we must 

bravely choose "Live and let live"—a way of thinking and value 

orientation that deals with interpersonal, intergroup, 

international, and even interstellar relationships (including the 

relationships between humans and nature, humans and society, and 

within oneself in terms of body, mind, and spirit). This means 

placing "Live and Let Die" and "To be or not to be" within the 

context of "Live and let live" to understand the emotional tone 

and outcomes of people's hesitation, choices, survival, and 

destruction. From this, a warning emerges: if we cannot "Live and 

let live" (mutual benefit, living and letting others live, 

thriving together), then it may lead to "Evil and let evil"

 (being evil oneself and allowing others to be evil, harming 

each other).


Elevating "Live and let live" to a philosophical recognition means 

that all individuals, communities, Trust organizations, especially 

representatives of group identities (especially leaders of the 

world's most powerful nation), must change the old dualistic view 

of subject and object—no longer regarding oneself as the subject 

(Subject) and treating others (he, she, it, or they) as material 

objects (Object) to be controlled or manipulated (no matter how 

good the intention). In cognition, the dualism of subject and 

object must be transformed into intersubjectivity (Intersubjective)

, and governed by symbiosis (Symbiosis), i.e., Live and let live.


Thus, in 2024, U.S. presidential candidates, following the spirit 

of Winthrop's "City upon a Hill," would be standing on the height 

of a new contemporary philosophical paradigm—innovating and 

re-choosing human ways of life: Everything Intersubjective 

Symbiosism!


Of course, this is an intellectually challenging requirement for 

current thinking—the very thinking that has caused "global 

problems."


Archer Hong Qian

Vancouver, August 15, 2024

67%(2)
33%(1)
缂備焦顨愰幏锟� 闂佸憡鐔幏锟� (闂婎偄娲ら幊姗€鍩€椤掆偓椤︾敻濡撮敓锟�): 闁诲海顣幏锟� 闂佹椿鍣幏锟� (闂婎偄娲ら幊姗€鍩€椤掆偓椤︾敻濡撮敓锟�): 濠电偛顦崝宀勫船娴犲妫橀柟娈垮枟閺嗗繘鏌熸潏鐐
标 题 (必选项):
内 容 (选填项):

濠电偛鐗呯徊濠氬箚閵堝鍐€闁绘挸娴风涵鈧�
闁诲孩绋掗妵鐐电礊閿燂拷
闁诲孩绋掗〃鍛般亹閿燂拷
实用资讯
北美最大最全的折扣机票网站
美国名厂保健品一级代理,花旗参,维他命,鱼油,卵磷脂,30天退货保证.买百免邮.
一周点击热帖 更多>>
1 闁诲海鎳撻幉锛勬崲閸愩劉鏋嶉柨鐕傛嫹2.0闂備礁鎼悧婊勭濠婂喚鍤曢柣鎴f绾偓婵犵數濮撮崐鍝モ偓锝傚亾闂備焦瀵х粙鎴︽儔閼测晜顐介柕濞炬櫅閻愬﹪鏌i敐鍛伇闁汇儱鎳忕换娑㈠级閹达富鈧銇勯敂鐣屽弨闁瑰磭鍠曠粻娑㈠Ψ瑜忛ˇ锟� 濠电偞鍨堕幐鎼佀囬悧鍫滅箚闁归棿绀佺粈鍡涙煃瑜濋幏锟�
2 闂備礁銈搁。锔剧矆娴h櫣鐜绘繛鎴欏灩鐎氬鏌嶈閸撴稓妲愰幒妤€閱囨繝闈涚墛椤旀垹绱撻崒娆戝妽闁荤喆鍊濋幊娆撳箣閿曗偓缁€鍌炴煕濡ゅ啫浠︾紒鍌氭喘閺岋綁濡搁妷銉患闂佸憡顏搁崨顖滅厯闁硅壈鎻徊浠嬫嚍閹惰姤鐓涢柛鏇㈡涧閻忕姵銇勯敂鍏煎 濠电偞鍨堕幐鎼佀囬悧鍫滅箚闁归棿绀佺粈鍡涙煃瑜濋幏锟�
3 濠电偞鍨堕幖鈺呭储閻撳篃鐟拔旈崨顓狀唴濠德板€撶粈渚€鎮樺☉銏$厾闁惧浚鍋嗛惌濠囨煕閳轰礁顏柟顖氬暣瀹曠喖顢楁担椋庡笡闂備胶枪缁绘垶绻涙繝鍥ф瀬妞ゆ挶鍨归崒銊╂煟閺冨牊鏁辩紒鈧崼銉︾叆婵炴垶鐟ч悡顖炴煙闊彃鈧牜绮嬪澶嬫櫢闁跨噦鎷� 濠电姰鍨归悥銏ゅ礃閳哄喚娲┑鐘殿暯閳ь剙鍟块埀顒€缍婇獮鎴︽晲閸℃劒绮撻梺璺ㄥ櫐閹凤拷
4 闁诲孩顔栭崰姘叏閺夋埈鍤曢柛顭戝亞閻熷綊鏌eΟ鍝勬毐闁诲繑鐩弻锝夋晲閸愩劌濮庣紓浣规椤ユ挻绂掗敃鍌氱劦闁跨噦鎷� 闂備胶鎳撻崲鎻掔暦椤掆偓閻g兘宕楃涵椋庣>闂佸搫绋侀崢濂稿储閿燂拷 闂備礁鎲¢懝楣冩偋閸℃娲箰鎼达絺鏋栭梺璺ㄥ櫐閹凤拷 濠电偞鍨堕幐鎼佀囬悧鍫滅箚闁归棿绀佺粈鍡涙煃瑜濋幏锟�
5 濠电姰鍨归悥銏ゅ礋椤掍緡鍟€闂佽閰eḿ褍螞濞戙垺鍋夋繝濠傜墕閸欏﹥銇勯弽銊р姇闁跨喆鍎茬换娑欏緞鐎n偆顦梺缁橆殢閸撴盯骞忛悩璇茬闁绘ê纾弳鐘绘⒑閻愯棄鍔滈柡宀嬬節閸┾偓妞ゆ帊鐒﹂埛鎺楁偨椤栨碍宸濆ù婊勭摃缁犳稒鎯旈敐澶嬵唭 濠电姰鍨归悥銏ゅ礃閳哄喚娲┑鐘殿暯閳ь剙鍟块埀顒€缍婇獮鎴︽晲閸℃劒绮撻梺璺ㄥ櫐閹凤拷
6 闂備胶绮划宀勵敄閸℃稒鍎婇煫鍥ㄦ磵閸嬫挻鎷呴崘鐐秷濡炪倖鍨甸崐鍧楀箚閸曨垱鍋勭紒瀣儥閺嗭繝鏌i悢椋庢闁稿鎹囬弻銊モ槈濞嗘帒顥濋梺闈╃秵閸ㄥ崬顕ラ崟顖氱倞妞ゅ繐瀚竟鎺楁倵濞堝灝鏋涢柛鐔叉櫇缂傛挾鎹勯妸褏锛炲┑掳鍊撻悞锕傛倿閿燂拷 濠电偞鍨堕幐鎼佀囬悧鍫滅箚闁归棿绀佺粈鍡涙煃瑜濋幏锟�
7 闂備焦鍎崇换鎰潩閿旇姤鍎熷┑鐘插暟閳绘棃鏌涢妷鎴濇噽娴硷拷 缂傚倷鐒﹂弻銊ワ耿闁稁鏁傚┑鍌溓圭粻浼存煙鐎电ǹ顎岄柡鍡樼矒閺屾盯顢曢浣割伓 濠电偞鍨堕幐鎼佀囬悧鍫滅箚闁归棿绀佺粈鍡涙煃瑜濋幏锟�
8 濠电偞鍨堕幖鈺呭储娴犲鍑犻柛鎰ㄦ櫇閳绘梻鈧箍鍎遍幊搴ㄦ倵婵犳碍鐓曟俊銈勭劍缁€鈧銈忛檮閻撯€愁嚕椤愶箑绠ユい鏃傛櫕閺嗙娀鎮楀▓鍨灈闁挎洩绠戦~蹇斻偅閸愨晜娅栧┑顔斤供閸嬪倻鑺辨导瀛樺€甸梻鍫熺〒閻n參鏌嶈閸撴瑩鏁冮妶澶婂偍闁跨噦鎷� 濠电偞鍨堕幐鎼佀囬悧鍫滅箚闁归棿绀佺粈鍡涙煃瑜濋幏锟�
9 濠电偞鍨堕幐鍝ョ矓瀹曞洦顫曢柟娈垮枟婵ジ鏌嶇悰鈥充壕缂備讲鈧啿顏繛鐓庮煼楠炲鈹戠€n偄鐨哄┑鐐村灦閹尖晠宕i崘顔肩劦妞ゆ帊鐒﹂ˉ鍫ユ煃瑜滈崗姗€宕戦幘瓒佸綊鏁愯箛鏂款伓 濠电偞鍨堕幐鎼佀囬悧鍫滅箚闁归棿绀佺粈鍡涙煃瑜濋幏锟�
10 闂備礁鎼幏瀣窗閺囥垹瑙﹂柨鐕傛嫹: 闂備胶鎳撻悺銊╁垂閸愭祴鍫柟瀵稿仧閻濊埖銇勯幇鈺佺仼鐎垫澘绉归弻锝夊Ω閵夈儺浼傞梺鍛婃尭閵堟悂鐛澶婄劦妞ゆ帒瀚粈鍡椢涙0浣藉厡妞ゆ挸鎼…璺ㄦ崉閸濆嫷浼掔紓浣介哺缁诲啰绮悢鍏兼櫢闁跨噦鎷� 濠电姰鍨归悥銏ゅ礃閳哄喚娲┑鐘殿暯閳ь剙鍟块埀顒€缍婇獮鎴︽晲閸℃劒绮撻梺璺ㄥ櫐閹凤拷
一周回复热帖
1 濠电偞鍨堕幐鍝ョ矓瀹曞洦顫曢柟娈垮枟婵ジ鏌嶇悰鈥充壕缂備讲鈧啿顏繛鐓庮煼楠炲鈹戠€n偄鐨哄┑鐐村灦閹尖晠宕i崘顔肩劦妞ゆ帊鐒﹂ˉ鍫ユ煃瑜滈崗姗€宕戦幘瓒佸綊鏁愯箛鏂款伓 濠电偞鍨堕幐鎼佀囬悧鍫滅箚闁归棿绀佺粈鍡涙煃瑜濋幏锟�
2 闂備焦鍎崇换鎰潩閿旇姤鍎熷┑鐘插暟閳绘棃鏌涢妷鎴濇噽娴硷拷 缂傚倷鐒﹂弻銊ワ耿闁稁鏁傚┑鍌溓圭粻浼存煙鐎电ǹ顎岄柡鍡樼矒閺屾盯顢曢浣割伓 濠电偞鍨堕幐鎼佀囬悧鍫滅箚闁归棿绀佺粈鍡涙煃瑜濋幏锟�
3 闂備線娼уΛ妤呮晝閿曗偓閳诲秹濡搁埡鍐ㄧウ闂佸搫顦伴崹顖涚閿濆鐓曟繛鍡樺厧椤忓牊鍎戞い鎺嶈兌閳绘棃骞栫€涙〒姘跺磻閹炬枼鍫柛鎰╁妿椤斿矂鏌i姀鈺佺仭缂佽鍊搁湁婵°倕鎳庣粈宀勬煛瀹ュ啫鈧劙宕戦幘鏂ユ斀濠电姴瀚呴鍫熺厱闁哄啯鎸荤€氾拷 濠电偞鍨堕幐鎼佀囬悧鍫滅箚闁归棿绀佺粈鍡涙煃瑜濋幏锟�
4 闂備胶绮划宀勵敄閸℃稑鍨傛い鎺戝閸嬫垿鏌i幘鍐差劉闁稿﹥鐗曢湁婵犲﹤鍟ˉ锟犳煟閿曗偓濠€閬嶅焵椤掆偓濠€閬嶅磻閻樼粯鍎戦柡澶嬪灍閺岋附绻涢崱妤冪闁伙讣鎷� 濠电偞鍨堕幐鎼佀囬悧鍫滅箚闁归棿绀佺粈鍡涙煃瑜濋幏锟�
5 婵犳鍣徊鍓х矙閹邦喒鍋撻棃娑氱伇闁轰緡鍣i、姗€鎮╅锝嗘珫闂佺儵鍓濈敮鎺楁晝閿濆洦瀚婚柣鏃囨缁€鍐箹缁懓澧茬紒鍌氭喘閺屾盯濡烽妸锔绘缂備緡鐓夌换婵嗙暦濡 鏋庨柟鐑樻尰琚i梺鑽ゅТ濞村嫰骞忛敓锟� 濠电偞鍨堕幐鎼佀囬悧鍫滅箚闁归棿绀佺粈鍡涙煃瑜濋幏锟�
6 濠电偞鍨堕幖鈺呭储娴犲鍑犻柛鎰ㄦ櫇閳绘梻鈧箍鍎遍幊搴ㄦ倵婵犳碍鐓曟俊銈勭劍缁€鈧銈忛檮閻撯€愁嚕椤愶箑绠ユい鏃傛櫕閺嗙娀鎮楀▓鍨灈闁挎洩绠戦~蹇斻偅閸愨晜娅栧┑顔斤供閸嬪倻鑺辨导瀛樺€甸梻鍫熺〒閻n參鏌嶈閸撴瑩鏁冮妶澶婂偍闁跨噦鎷� 濠电偞鍨堕幐鎼佀囬悧鍫滅箚闁归棿绀佺粈鍡涙煃瑜濋幏锟�
7 闁诲孩顔栭崰姘叏閺夋埈鍤曢柛顭戝亞閻熷綊鏌eΟ鍝勬毐闁诲繑鐩弻锝夋晲閸愩劌濮庣紓浣规椤ユ挻绂掗敃鍌氱劦闁跨噦鎷� 闂備胶鎳撻崲鎻掔暦椤掆偓閻g兘宕楃涵椋庣>闂佸搫绋侀崢濂稿储閿燂拷 闂備礁鎲¢懝楣冩偋閸℃娲箰鎼达絺鏋栭梺璺ㄥ櫐閹凤拷 濠电偞鍨堕幐鎼佀囬悧鍫滅箚闁归棿绀佺粈鍡涙煃瑜濋幏锟�
8 闂備礁鎼崐绋棵洪敃鈧嵄闁瑰濮锋稉宥夋煃瑜滈崜鐔风暦閿濆洦瀚氱憸蹇曠玻濡ゅ啰纾奸柍褜鍓熷畷锝夊Ψ瑜忛悰銉╂⒑閸涘﹤绗掓俊顐n殕鐎靛ジ骞囬弶璺槷闂佸憡鍔樼亸娆愪繆閸ヮ剚鐓曢柡鍌氱仢閺嗗崬鈹戦鍡樺 濠电偞鍨堕幐鎼佀囬悧鍫滅箚闁归棿绀佺粈鍡涙煃瑜濋幏锟�
9 缂傚倸鍊搁崯顖炪€冮崨瀛樺剭闁汇垻枪濡ɑ銇勯弽銊р枔闁稿鎸婚幆鏂库攽閸垺婢栭梻浣告啞閻熴儵鎮ч崨顖滅當濠㈣埖鍔栭崵鍐┿亜閺嶃劎鈽夐柤浣冾潐椤ㄣ儵鎮欓懠顑胯檸濠碘槅鍨伴敃顏勭暦濮橀鏁冮柕蹇曞У閺嬮箖姊洪崨濠傜瑲闁荤喆鍊楅懞閬嶆晸閿燂拷 濠电偞鍨堕幐鎼佀囬悧鍫滅箚闁归棿绀佺粈鍡涙煃瑜濋幏锟�
10 闂備胶绮划宀勵敄閸℃稒鍎婇煫鍥ㄦ磵閸嬫挻鎷呴崘鐐秷濡炪倖鍨甸崐鍧楀箚閸曨垱鍋勭紒瀣儥閺嗭繝鏌i悢椋庢闁稿鎹囬弻銊モ槈濞嗘帒顥濋梺闈╃秵閸ㄥ崬顕ラ崟顖氱倞妞ゅ繐瀚竟鎺楁倵濞堝灝鏋涢柛鐔叉櫇缂傛挾鎹勯妸褏锛炲┑掳鍊撻悞锕傛倿閿燂拷 濠电偞鍨堕幐鎼佀囬悧鍫滅箚闁归棿绀佺粈鍡涙煃瑜濋幏锟�
历史上的今天:回复热帖
2023: 统一战线是革命的法宝
2022: 加 速 主 义矛头不仅仅针对特定国家,在
2022: 西方所谓的“加 速 主 义”并不是什么新
2021: 写给懂人性且热心于设计制度的特有理
2021: 丑闻缠身的俞怀松能把美国共和党带向何
2020: 杨勇之子谈出兵朝鲜70周年:有什么好纪念
2020: 习男儿效法列疯子关门收割,粉红们自作
2019: 知情者爆料郭文贵“造假团队”内幕
2019: 跪添“郭大侠”的“赵大妈”