繁体中文  
 
版主:x-file
 · 九阳全新免清洗型豆浆机 全美最低
 
马斯克在吹牛, 那个所谓的DOGE不是一个真正的部,只是提供建议参考,无权开除人
送交者:  2024年11月21日06:45:42 于 [世界游戏论坛] 发送悄悄话

Elon Musk has been proposed by Donald Trump to co-lead a newly envisioned "Department of Government Efficiency" (DOGE) alongside entrepreneur Vivek Ramaswamy, should Trump take office. This initiative, while called a "department," is not an official government agency but rather an advisory body aimed at streamlining federal government operations and reducing inefficiency. The name also humorously references the cryptocurrency Dogecoin, with which Musk is closely associated.

This department is seen as a push to implement significant cost-cutting measures and streamline bureaucratic processes in line with Trump's broader fiscal goals. Critics and commentators have debated the feasibility and potential impact of such an initiative, given Musk's bold yet controversial management style, as seen in his leadership of companies like Twitter and Tesla

.


If you’re interested in further updates, let me know!

You said:
so "Department of Government Efficiency" (DOGE) has no real authority to fire anybody but can only provide advice to Trump?
ChatGPT said:
ChatGPT

The proposed "Department of Government Efficiency" (DOGE), as envisioned by Donald Trump and co-led by Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy, is expected to function as an advisory body rather than a formal government agency with direct authority. This means that DOGE would primarily provide recommendations and strategies for reducing government inefficiencies, rather than exercising the power to hire, fire, or directly manage federal employees

.


Key Points:

  • Role: DOGE's role is to identify bureaucratic inefficiencies and propose cost-cutting measures.

  • Authority: It would lack formal authority to implement its recommendations independently, including firing federal employees. Any such actions would need to go through established government processes and agencies.

  • Impact: Its influence would depend on the willingness of Trump's administration to adopt its advice and the political and legal feasibility of the proposed reforms.

The initiative has drawn mixed reactions, with supporters lauding it as an innovative way to streamline governance, while critics question its practicality and the potential implications for federal operations


0%(0)
0%(0)
标 题 (必选项):
内 容 (选填项):
实用资讯
北美最大最全的折扣机票网站
美国名厂保健品一级代理,花旗参,维他命,鱼油,卵磷脂,30天退货保证.买百免邮.