the western intellectuals in general reflect a deep sense of ideological insecurity. For the past 100 years, owing to the overwhelming predominance of the west since the advent of the second industrial revolution, the western intellectuals had gotten accustomed to the belief of the unchallenged preeminence of its model of socioeconomic system together with its attendant canonization. Ideology with its inherent self-portraited infallibility had become the main weight of its cultural thrust. No competing model was able to successfully challenge its supremacy. At its height of confidence, most of its ardent defenders were even willing to admit the imperfection of their system, although deep inside they stubbornly clung on to the belief of its infallibility, often by declaration sometimes with ostentatiously humility – the best system yet devised. That is until the emergence of contemporary China with its high flying socioeconomic developments.  The rise of a rivalry model has shaking the foundation of many western ideological believes, challenging many of its assumptions and value systems. Many of them become intellectually entrenched. Instead of self examining and not unlike religious zealots,  many of the western intellectuals began to exhibit an abhorrence to cognitive dissonance. The plethora and periodic predications on the collapse of China by scholars and by political ideologues alike appearing on public media daily started to sound like a mournful metronome of doomsday prayers. There is nothing scholarly about most of these wishful predications worthy of study attention. But, it does demonstrate the deep psychological misgiving by western intellectual about the coming to an end of their long established sense of cultural superiority.