版主:黑木崖
    
 · 九阳全新免清洗型豆浆机 全美最低
 
You can't understand?
送交者: logic. 2018月06月06日21:07:17 于 [世界军事论坛] 发送悄悄话
回  答: 文章第一句是cnn报道过这样的消息,第二句意思就死美国空军否 黎头 于 2018-06-06 19:29:50

The first sentence reported the US DOD said the flight was OVER the islet(s).  The second sentence reported the USAF said they didn't fly NEAR the islet(s). 


When there are two units reporting, which one has the higher authority?  The higher hierachical one.  This whole story came out of the DOD first, essentially the US DOD said, "this time we are not only NEAR the islet(s), we are OVER the islet(s)".  The questions is then - "There are many, many islets in the South China Sea claimed by China, which one(s) they are talking about?"  Apparently it was not one of 永暑礁, 渚碧礁, 美济礁, or 西沙永兴岛,  otherwise the results would be very serious.  Then which one(s) the US DOD is referring to?


The US is playing the game of inching forward.  Each time they inch forward a little bit, a little bit, until China starts to respond seriuously.  Each time they humiliates China a little bit, although you can say, superficially.  But it's an open humiliation all right in front of the whole world.  This process won't stop until a serious incident erupts.  It doesn't look like the whole thing will end well.  We'll have to wait and see the eventuality.  But I can say for sure, it won't be pretty.

0%(0)
0%(0)
标 题 (必选项):
内 容 (选填项):
实用资讯
北美最大最全的折扣机票网站
美国名厂保健品一级代理,花旗参,维他命,鱼油,卵磷脂,30天退货保证.买百免邮.