繁体中文  
 
版主:bob
 · 九阳全新免清洗型豆浆机 全美最低
 
“先知”里根总统警告(川普)
送交者:  2018年11月19日10:36:32 于 [世界时事论坛] 发送悄悄话

What effect does the Trump circus have on the world?


1.jpg

Vice President Pence, left, and Singapore's Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong wait onstage for a group photo during the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) Summit in Singapore on Thursday. (Ore Huiying/Getty Images)



By Fareed Zakaria

Columnist

November 15

It’s easy to get distracted by the circus of the Trump presidency. But what is its larger effect? For an answer to that question, take a look at three gatherings this week on the other side of the planet.

Attended by all of the major Asian countries, the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) and East Asia summits in Singapore and the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) conference in Papua New Guinea are particularly important, because countries in the region are trying to navigate the once-in-a-lifetime power shift taking place: the rise of China. For this, it is crucial that they understand the role of the world’s current superpower, the United States.

But the president of the United States is MIA. Donald Trump chose to skip the summits and send Vice President Pence in his place. Yet China’s Xi Jinping, Russia’s Vladimir Putin and India’s Narendra Modiare all visiting either Singapore or Papua New Guinea, while Japan’s Shinzo Abe and South Korea’s Moon Jae-in are traveling to both. Really, everyone except President Trump is going.

A persistent complaint from Asian countries has been that while the United States worries about the rise of China — as Pence did in his speech at the ASEAN summit — it is abandoning the field to Beijing. It does not take the time to attend meetings, shape the agenda, shore up its alliances or deepen its ties in the region. Trump’s continued lack of interest will only feed this fear.

We are seeing the Trump effect in the retreat on trade in Asia. The two mechanisms for greater prosperity and cooperation that were moving toward completion in the region had been the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) and the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) . Trump pulled the United States out of the TPP, undermining the pact’s goal of giving Asian countries an alternative to a Chinese-dominated system. The RCEP, which includes China, is also meant to open up Asian economies and increase commerce and contact in the region. But after 24 rounds of negotiations, momentum appears to have slowed, perhaps even stalled.

India is trying to protect its market from Chinese imports, other countries are trying to keep India’s service industries out and everyone can take solace that this is all simply an echo of what the world’s superpower, the United States, is doing in its own trade negotiations.

I’ve written before, and continue to believe, that the Trump administration has a valid point about China’s abuse of the trading system and is right to get tough with Beijing. But it is grossly mistaken in its instinctive opposition to trade, repeatedly voiced by the president. “If we didn’t trade, we’d save a hell of a lot of money,” Trump said in a speech in July, a statement that is simply false. According to calculations by Gary Hufbauer and Lucy Lu of the Peterson Institute for International Economics , the expansion of trade since 1950 increased U.S. gross domestic product to the tune of $2.1 trillion in 2016. That is equivalent to a gain of $7,014 per person, or $18,131 per household.

To watch India’s government now try to protect its markets and raise tariffs is a sad case of a country that appears to have forgotten its own history. India has decades of experience with high tariffs, which were designed to give its domestic industries a boost. The result was uncompetitive companies, shoddy products, widespread corruption and economic stagnation. Then, in the early 1990s, it slashed tariffs and red tape, ushering in three decades as the world’s second-fastest-growing large economy, lifting more than 150 million people out of extreme poverty. Does it really want to try to make Indian socialism great again?

Few ideas have been as thoroughly tested through history as the notion that trade raises a country’s income and living standards. It can also create habits of cooperation, even peace, as it has done in Europe and as it might help do in Asia. American leaders understood that for decades, until now. In 1988, President Ronald Reagan warned, “We should beware of the demagogues who are ready to declare a trade war against our friends — weakening our economy, our national security and the entire free world — all while cynically waving the American flag. The expansion of the international economy is not a foreign invasion; it is an American triumph, one we worked hard to achieve, and something central to our vision of a peaceful and prosperous world of freedom.”

0%(0)
0%(0)
标 题 (必选项):
内 容 (选填项):
实用资讯
北美最大最全的折扣机票网站
美国名厂保健品一级代理,花旗参,维他命,鱼油,卵磷脂,30天退货保证.买百免邮.
一周点击热帖 更多>>
一周回复热帖
历史上的今天:回复热帖
2017: 正議統獨
2017: 文贵的心理素质是一流的
2016: 习近平会同印度开战吗? zt
2016: 台湾行5:盗运故宫文物是赚还是赔了?
2015: 穆斯林教真的比基督教邪恶吗 zt
2015: 我承认我是一个懦弱自私的华人 zt
2014: 神把他的心愿都寄托在了人身上
2014: 军委副主席开会没请宋祖英 是重大信号
2013: 上诉之前 中纪委找薄熙来谈话的细节流出
2013: 是不是大通用正常价格雇了个中国人你就